{
  "id": "QC-0003",
  "reviewed": "2026-09-11",
  "title": "Rich 124060 \u00b7 Second QC",
  "type": "Pre-shipment public demo",
  "reddit_url": "https://www.reddit.com/r/RepTimeQC/comments/1wcuonc/second_qc_rich_124060/",
  "album_url": "https://andiotwatches.x.yupoo.com/albums/254262561?uid=1",
  "dealer": "Andiot",
  "factory_claim": "Rich",
  "model_claim": "124060 free sprung",
  "price_reported": "$553 including shipping",
  "album_reference": "AE158149/9.10ex",
  "verdict": "GL",
  "confidence": "Moderate",
  "summary": "A reasonable green light if the small index imperfections shown here are acceptable to you. The 3 and 6 markers are not perfectly straight, but the evidence does not establish a major dial or bezel fault that warrants replacement. The timing clip is reassuring and the setting demonstration supports basic hand alignment.",
  "counts": {
    "reddit_images": 15,
    "reddit_videos": 0,
    "dealer_photos": 15,
    "dealer_videos": 3,
    "duplicate_photo_pairs": 14,
    "annotated_derivatives": 1,
    "independent_photos": 15,
    "retained_evidence_items": 19,
    "downloaded_gallery_files": 33
  },
  "findings": [
    {
      "id": "twelve",
      "title": "12 o\u2019clock triangle",
      "status": "Minor / uncertain magnitude",
      "observation": "The triangle has a slight counterclockwise-looking bias or asymmetry in both corrected views. The outer rim and luminous interior do not produce the same apparent axis.",
      "assessment": "Acceptable for a pragmatic GL; do not describe it as perfectly aligned.",
      "limit": "Reflective chamfers and threshold selection make an exact angle unreliable. No certified physical rotation is assigned."
    },
    {
      "id": "six",
      "title": "6 o\u2019clock baton",
      "status": "Minor repeatable bias",
      "observation": "A small counterclockwise lean survives independent correction in P07 and P15. Thresholded lume measurements cluster around 1.3\u20131.7\u00b0 counterclockwise in the corrected images.",
      "assessment": "Small cosmetic imperfection, not a standalone RL in this review.",
      "limit": "These are apparent image angles, not factory tolerances or measurements of the physical setting."
    },
    {
      "id": "three",
      "title": "3 o\u2019clock baton",
      "status": "Minor repeatable bias",
      "observation": "A slight clockwise lean is visible in both corrected views. Lume measurements are roughly 0.4\u20131.3\u00b0 clockwise; most trials are close to 1\u00b0.",
      "assessment": "Worth disclosing alongside 12 and 6. GL remains reasonable if a small visible imperfection will not bother the buyer.",
      "limit": "The marker is raised above the printed track; crystal optics and edge highlights remain after planar correction."
    },
    {
      "id": "bezel",
      "title": "15-minute bezel bar & pip",
      "status": "No convincing RL defect",
      "observation": "The 15-minute bar looks a little high against the dial in the raw views, but no convincing isolated malformed engraving or missing fill is visible. The pip appears seated approximately centrally in its triangle.",
      "assessment": "Do not RL for this evidence alone. An exactly face-on photograph with the bezel positively indexed at 12 would resolve the remaining registration question.",
      "limit": "The bezel and printed dial are at different heights. A dial-plane grid cannot certify bezel registration, and this report does not promise that a single click will fix it."
    },
    {
      "id": "hands",
      "title": "Hands & setting demonstration",
      "status": "Looks acceptable",
      "observation": "No obvious in-plane kink is visible in the long minute hand or seconds hand. V02 shows the hands being advanced and meeting near 12 at approximately 7\u20139 seconds.",
      "assessment": "Useful positive evidence of basic hand setting and alignment at the supplied resolution.",
      "limit": "A short clip cannot establish full-cycle hand clearance, long-term reliability, or every mechanical function."
    },
    {
      "id": "printing",
      "title": "Dial printing & remaining indices",
      "status": "Looks acceptable",
      "observation": "Text is legible and the visible lines appear coherent. No large print dropout or conspicuously displaced circular hour marker is apparent. The 9 marker has no comparably robust measured tilt.",
      "assessment": "No specimen-level printing defect that changes the recommendation.",
      "limit": "This is manufacturing QC from the supplied media, not authentication or a font-by-font comparison with a genuine 124060. Isolated bright specks do not prove trapped dial debris."
    },
    {
      "id": "timing",
      "title": "Timegrapher",
      "status": "Reassuring snapshot",
      "observation": "V01 visibly reads +1 s/day, 278\u00b0 amplitude, 0.0 ms beat error and a 52.0\u00b0 lift-angle setting. The visible short trace is orderly.",
      "assessment": "The supplied reading supports GL; it is independently visible in the video rather than merely copied from the post.",
      "limit": "Lift angle is a device setting, not proof it is correct for the installed movement. Wind state, long duration and multiple positions are not established. These numbers do not guarantee wrist accuracy."
    },
    {
      "id": "finishing",
      "title": "SELs, case, bracelet & lume",
      "status": "No obvious major fault",
      "observation": "The visible end-link junctions do not show a conspicuously open gap. Case and bracelet views show no obvious gross damage; the clasp is opened and closed in V02. P01 shows the main luminous elements illuminated.",
      "assessment": "No replacement-level fault demonstrated in these areas.",
      "limit": "Film and glove coverage limit surface and lower-SEL inspection. A single lume photo does not measure brightness matching or duration. Clasp security, water resistance and materials are not certified."
    }
  ],
  "seller_message": "The QC looks broadly good to me. Before shipping, could you send one straight-on photo with the bezel positively indexed at 12, so I can confirm the 15-minute bar against the dial? I can see small index-angle imperfections and am deciding whether I am comfortable with them. Please also confirm the correct lift-angle setting for this movement and that the hands clear each other throughout a full cycle.",
  "recommendation_rules": {
    "GL": "Approve if the illustrated minor marker biases are acceptable and the seller confirms the ordinary pre-shipment functional checks.",
    "RL": "Request another example if a clean, square-on recheck shows a materially mis-set marker or persistent bezel registration fault that is unacceptable to you, or if a functional defect is demonstrated. The current evidence alone does not justify a blanket RL."
  },
  "review_limits": "Programmatic image checks plus AI visual assessment. No separate human watchmaker sign-off. Factory, free-sprung construction, movement identity, metal specification, authenticity, water resistance and power reserve are not verified. Confidence labels are qualitative, not calibrated probabilities.",
  "public_url": "https://repqc.app/rich-124060/"
}